Hillary Clinton - Liar or Inconvenient Truths?
From CNN.com report
Hillary Clinton: Truth or Consequences Posted: 10:14 AM ET
Hillary Clinton has many admirable qualities, but candor and openness and transparency and a commitment to well-established fact have not been notable among them. The indisputable elements of her Bosnian adventure affirm (again) the reluctant conclusion I reached in the final chapter of A Woman In Charge, my biography of her published last June:
Hillary Clinton
“Since her Arkansas years [I wrote], Hillary Rodham Clinton has always had a difficult relationship with the truth… [J]udged against the facts, she has often chosen to obfuscate, omit, and avoid. It is an understatement by now that she has been known to apprehend truths about herself and the events of her life that others do not exactly share. ” [italics added]
As I noted:
“Almost always, something holds her back from telling the whole story, as if she doesn’t trust the reader, listener, friend, interviewer, constituent—or perhaps herself—to understand the true significance of events…”
The Bosnian episode is a watershed event, because it indelibly brings to mind so many examples of this tendency– from the White House years and, worse, from Hillary Clinton’s take-no-prisoners presidential campaign. Her record as a public person is replete with “misstatements” and elisions and retracted and redacted and revoked assertions…
When the facts surrounding such characteristic episodes finally get sorted out — usually long after they have been challenged — the mysteries and contradictions are often dealt with by Hillary Clinton and her apparat in a blizzard of footnotes, addenda, revision, and disingenuous re-explanation
Hello dollyliama, If you were asking about what Obama lied about, then i can tell you. And they are not unsubstantiated, they are all in the news, very substantiated. #1. Resko is just a casual aquaintance, NOT, he is a friend of 19 yrs. that obama approached with the deal that obama pocketed 625 thousand dollars from. # 2. I was never there when he made those kinds of comments, he has since admitted that he knew of Wrights anti-American sentiments, but didnt agree. #3. He did agree with Wright, hence his 20 yr stay in the church, and his own book bears this out. #4. He doesnt take money from lobbiest. He returned a $2500.00 hundred dollar check to a known lobbiest and a week later cashed a 5000.00 thousand dollar check from the mans wife, who conveniently wanted to donate to him on her own, hence the original 2500.00 plus an additional $2500.00. So he got the money and it came from a lobbiest, he was just cunning in the way he went about it. And if you really want to know what his real agenda is, read his book, and read the 10 point black value system that they go by.