Fuel Efficiency Regulation

is a Environment centric issue

The Automotive Industry and Fuel Efficiency Regulation

Forums  >  The Automotive Industry and Fuel Efficiency Regulation

3 Agree
0 Disagree
1 is Undecided
What do you think? Sign up or Log in

sam (38)
Progressive
posted 328 days, 6 hours, 25 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend

The Automotive Industry and Fuel Efficiency Regulation

A note to GM and Ford: You aren't losing to the Japanese because they make better cars. Some people think that they do, some think that they don't. You are losing to Japanese carmakers because they make cars that Americans want to buy, and you refuse to.

Here's a car that Americans want to buy. In light of high gas prices, Americans want fuel-efficient cars that produce low emissions, and they want those fuel efficient cars at a low price. American carmakers, seeing this, refuse to change thier public image by producing such cars, and hope that they will somehow prosper by continuing to produce large, dirty, expensive, gas-guzzling SUV's. Japanese carmakers, seeing the aforementioned trend in American car tastes, make an image of themselves centered around clean, inexpensive, fuel-efficient cars. And they outsell American carmakers.

The U.S. Auto industry can make fuel-efficient cars if they want to. It's just cheaper to make slightly less efficient ones. They are also capable of engineering these cars to be safe, so that mass lost in engineering up fuel efficiency does not translate into higher fatalities in crashes. They just do not wish to because they fear that it will increase production costs and put them out of business.

Will it increase production costs? Yes. But Detroit will be far better off with the standards than without them. Why? Because if Americans see Detroit producing fuel-efficient cars, they will buy American cars again. How do I know this is the case? Because Toyota is so scared that American carmakers will have to build cars that will compete with their cars that they lobby against the hightened standards right along with American carmakers.

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

gueb (19)
Libertarian - Republican
posted 321 days, 9 hours, 9 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend

agrees with the original post

Yes, currently GM and Ford are finally starting to produce efficient vehicles to catch up. This would have happened much faster if they weren't being subsidized by the federal government. While I think climate change ought to be a national security issue (according to the Pentagon it is), I don't believe more government regulations/subsidies will help.

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

ctm3rd (4)
Undecided - Independent
posted 293 days, 11 hours, 22 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend

agrees with the original post

I like many Americans buy cars that are engineered and designed elsewhere and produced in America.

Car company's from Europe, Japan, and Korea design and engineer cars that get 30-40mpg and we build them in America.

There is absolutely no reason we can not build cars that get the same milage or better.

 

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

kate (87)
Moderate
posted 291 days, 9 hours, 10 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend


sam says:

" Will it increase production costs? Yes. But Detroit will be far better off with the standards than without them. Why? Because if Americans see Detroit producing fuel-efficient cars, they will buy American cars again. How do I know this is the case? Because Toyota is so scared that American carmakers will have to build cars that will compete with their cars that they lobby against the hightened standards right along with American carmakers. "



Really? I didn't realize they were lobbying against standards. Are there any links/articles you could send this way? Thanks

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

bethany (291)
Moderate
posted 291 days, 7 hours, 26 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend

undecided opinion

Even if American car manufacturers were producing more fuel efficient vehicles, Americans are still more satisfied with the quality and durability of Asian cars. I think Toyota realizes that competing in the market means more than just delivering better gas millage.

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

ffdesmond (84)
Moderate - Democratic
posted 201 days, 21 hours, 43 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend

agrees with the original post

Although I do agree that we need to get more efficient vehicles, we also need to begin using some alternate fuels. Gas/electric and flex fuel is great, but why not also begin getting rid of fossil fuels? We get away from current fuel forms and we kill two birds with one stone, the other bird being dependency on foreign oil. My final thought is this, the bigger problem is convincing a lot of Americans in the west and mid-west that most of them do not need the large pick ups that we currently enjoy so much.

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

musicfreak313 (1)
Liberal
posted 4 days, 5 hours, 15 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend


I heard they are trying to produce another fuel as well. I saw it in this documentary http://www.fieldsoffuel.com/ Whatever is affordable and best for the environment.

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in