Barack Obama

 is a Democratic Senator and Presidential Candidate from Illinois

Truly an “In Your Face”

Forums  >  Truly an “In Your Face”

0 Agree
1 Disagrees
0 are Undecided
What do you think? Sign up or Log in

tda (119)
Liberal - Democratic
posted 129 days, 31 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend

Truly an “In Your Face”

 

 

 Senator Obama very fittingly chose St. Paul, Minnesota (Republican Convention – September), for next Tuesday night’s rally when the Senator will hopefully be over the top in the required number of delegates to capture the Democratic nomination for the Presidency:

"It's the place where John McCain will accept the nomination. It's a good place for us to kick off the next phase of the campaign," Robert Gibbs, Obama's communications director, said in an interview. Minnesota was a swing state that eventually went for Democrat John Kerry in the 2004 presidential election.

It’s gratifying to support a candidate with this much confidence and determination.

Source: MSNBC

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

theone (42)
Undecided
posted 127 days, 4 hours, 32 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend

disgrees with the original post

Vote for Obama, and kiss our Freedom goodbye ---YEAH!

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

bethany (291)
Moderate
posted 126 days, 7 hours, 41 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend


theone says:

"Vote for Obama, and kiss our Freedom goodbye ---YEAH!"



How, exactly?

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

theone (42)
Undecided
posted 125 days, 11 hours, 51 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend

disgrees with the original post

Let me tell you why’s your freedom will not be the same. Even since Democrat running the house, everything is going down hill, and what’s Obama doing anything about it? –nothing, but only complaining and pointing the fingers to someone else, mean while Nancy Pelosi is one of the riches woman in the country –go figure, and what exactly do we get form Democrat, that running the house right now? Nothing but paying more and more tax increase for themselves. Obama can surely talks, but I don’t think he has the action! He said he want to talk to the enemies of USA, what do you think the enemies would want to talk to him? If they do, they will ask the USA and allies to get out of their land and stay out of their affairs (I doubt it will happen), and this morning he said he wants to talk to Israel and Palestinian to work together side by side (peace of course), and he also wants to talk to Iran too? What do you think Iran will say? –Stop support Israel, and let me finish me nuclear program. In the mean time terrorist start building up the cells in the USA, and if they don’t get what they want –they will attack, this time is going to be worst than 9.11, because they already learned that lesson, it only take one terrorist to make you fear the worst to come. That’s your Freedom right there (FEAR). –This is just one example –oh, there are more...American still has to long way to learn how to talk to the enemies

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

HelloDollyLlama (1659)
Moderate - No Party Affiliation
posted 123 days, 15 hours, 57 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend


Your point is both inaccurate and irrelevant to the actual topic.

As for Congress -- the Republicans publicly admitted that they were deliberately pursuing a course of obstruction in Congress, for political purposes. They set an all-time record for actual or threatened vetoes and filibusters.

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

ffdesmond (84)
Moderate - Democratic
posted 123 days, 10 hours, 46 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend


With how this line is going, I just have one question: If we are opening dialogue with nations and people who currently hate us as a nation, why would there be more terrorist activity? I believe that the terrorism that plagues us today is from generations of doing what America wants without thinking twice of who we offend. I believe in Obama because I think he will talk to and appoint people who will talk to these rogue leaders and try to protect America because people will not hate us quite so much.

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

tsooozavel (1)
Moderate
posted 113 days, 17 hours, 31 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend


Right now, they are just starting to set the tone of their campaign. This early, i really can't tell which i would side with, but i am leaning towards obama. Furthermore, the GOP base is not even warming up to mccain (of course, i could be wrong) and even though it's still early in the game, this just proves to show how we see our candidates to-date. i know i will get burned for this, but i think mccain is a warmonger. i get the impression that he doesn't care to what happens to our troops in the middle east and the other parts of the world. Can’t we just all get along? i think it is time for a purification; i think it is time for a change; i think it is time for obama time. Now that the candidates are set for the US Presidential Election, Barack Obama and John McCain are beginning to set the tone for their campaign. Looking at their most recent speeches in http://pollclash.com , what do you think about what you hear?

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

HelloDollyLlama (1659)
Moderate - No Party Affiliation
posted 113 days, 10 hours, 1 minute ago
PM me | Add as Friend


We already know McCain doesn't care about the troops. Not only did he oppose a bill to help veterans -- he didn't even bother to show up for the vote.

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

AvengingTiki (273)
Progressive
posted 113 days, 9 hours, 47 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend


Tsooozavel, I think a lot of moderates are coming to the same conclusions you are.  McCain has shown that the only real foreign policy idea he has in his head is starting/continuing wars.  Perhaps an even greater sin is his lack of support for the Veteran's Bill of Rights, he offerred no good reason to not support that bill and has turned his back on his fellow veterans.  I find it disgraceful and was the last straw for me in a long line of events that have caused me to lose all respect for Senator McCain as a politician.

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

GoUSA (14)
Conservative
posted 113 days, 5 hours, 11 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend


Scrutinizing past voting records doesn't only hurt McCain, Obama voted to support the troop surge. That was until he saw some public opinion polls, and changed his mind COMPLETELY. Way to flip-flop, and then complain about Hillary voting to start the war in the first place...

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

HelloDollyLlama (1659)
Moderate - No Party Affiliation
posted 112 days, 13 hours, 30 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend


No, he didn't. After Bush's national security adviser publicly admitted that Bush was blackmailing Congress -- sending troops to Iraq without funding, and daring Congress not to write the check -- Obama voted to write the check. He supported the troops. Polls had nothing to do with it.

Sigh. More GOP lies and smears.

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

tda (119)
Liberal - Democratic
posted 112 days, 10 hours, 32 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend


I believe Senator Obama’s record on the issue of Iraq speaks for itself:

As a candidate for the United States Senate in 2002, Obama put his political career on the line to oppose going to war in Iraq, and warned of “an occupation of undetermined length, with undetermined costs, and undetermined consequences.” Obama has been a consistent, principled and vocal opponent of the war in Iraq.

In 2003 and 2004, he spoke out against the war on the campaign trail In 2005, he called for a phased withdrawal of our troops;
In 2006, he called for a timetable to remove our troops, a political solution within Iraq, and aggressive diplomacy with all of Iraq’s neighbors;
In January 2007, he introduced legislation in the Senate to remove all of our combat troops from Iraq by March 2008.
In September 2007, he laid out a detailed plan for how he will end the war as president.

Source:Obama HQ

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

GoUSA (14)
Conservative
posted 112 days, 9 hours, 29 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend


well that's not what the NY Times said, a slightly liberal newspaper. I'm just saying he changed his mind too quickly, if you're ok with that, then that's fine. But I'm not :).

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in

HelloDollyLlama (1659)
Moderate - No Party Affiliation
posted 112 days, 7 hours, 34 minutes ago
PM me | Add as Friend


No, no, no. He didn't. You're mixing up the decision to go to war, with the decision to fund troops already deployed. It's two different things, completely. Sloppy logic.

Respond:
Sign up  |   Log in