Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Oil Drilling

is a Environment centric issue
Make changes to this page


2 Photos  |   Videos

Do you support Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Oil Drilling? Yes | No

The proposed 2,000 acre Coastal Plains region of the ANWR in Alaska has created a divide between environmentalists, big oil, and political parties alike, sparking a discussion on where and how the US will get its oil, and at what cost.

The ANWR is located in the northeast corner of Alaska. The Refuge is about the size of South Carolina; however, the portion of the Refuge known as the 1002 Area is only about 6 percent of the total Refuge. Proponents of Refuge drilling predict that no more than 2000 acres will be disturbed if the 1002 Area is developed. The 1002 Area was excluded from wilderness designation and Congress specified that it be studied further through a comprehensive inventory of its fish and wildlife resources, and the potential for oil and gas production. In 1998, a USGS assessment of petroleum resources of the 1002 Area estimated the expected volume of technically recoverable oil beneath the 1002 area to be 7.7 billion barrels, with a 95 percent chance of 4.2 billion barrels and a 5 percent chance of 11.8 billion barrels. The U.S. currently consumes about 7 billion barrels per year. Of this, the U.S. imports about 4 billion barrels and produces about 3 billion barrels. Congressional action would also open up Native-owned lands. The overall mean estimate of technically recoverable oil for the 1002 region, including Native and state offshore areas is 10.4 billion barrels.

Proponents see potential drilling in the ANWR as extremeley promising. They point to the fact that domestic crude oil production, which has already declined from nearly 9 million barrels per day in 1985 to about 6.6 million barrels per day in early 1995, is projected to decline to less than 5 million barrels per day in 2010. This will result in a 10 million barrels/day deficit that will have to be made up with pricey foreign imports and/or new oil discoveries. (Source: anwr.org)

Opponents, while recognizing the economic benefits of such drilling, insist that such activity will disrupt the fragile ecosystem of the Coastal Plain, home to such wildlife as 130 bird species, polar bears, caribou, grizzly bears, wolves, artic foxes, whales, and wolverines.(Source: Defenders of Wildlife)

Still yet unresolved, the ANWR drilling debate will no doubt become pressing as conflict persists in the Middle East and gas prices continue to sky-rocket.


Where do the major players stand on this Issue?

Stance Person Profession
Joe Biden (D) Senator & 2008 Democratic Superdelegate
Sam Brownback (R) Senator
Hillary Clinton (D) Senator & Former First Lady
Chris Dodd (D) Senator & 2008 Democratic Superdelegate
John Edwards (D) Attorney and Former Presidential Candidate
Mike Huckabee (R) Fmr. Governor & Minister
Duncan Hunter (R) Congressman
Dennis Kucinich (D) Congressman
John McCain (R) Senator & Retired Naval Captain
Barack Obama (D) Senator and Presidential Candidate
Ron Paul (R) Congressman and Physician
Tommy Thompson (R) Former Wisconsin governor and Secretary of Health and Human Serivces
Mitt Romney (R) CEO & Former Governor
Tom Tancredo (R) U.S. Representative
George W. Bush (R) President of the United States
Fred Thompson (R) Presidential Candidate, Lawyer, Lobbyist, Actor, and Former Senator
Dick Cheney (R) Vice President
Trent Lott (R) Senator
Joseph Lieberman Senator
Kay Bailey Hutchison (R) Senator

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Oil Drilling Forum


This forum needs a kickstart!
Signup to Start Topic