Economic Sanctions on Iran

is a International Policy centric issue
Make changes to this page


1 Photo  |   Videos

Do you support Economic Sanctions on Iran? Yes | No

With Iran's 2003 fruition of their purportedly legitimate nuclear ambition came an international cry for economic sanctions and dialogue with the deviant President Ahmadinejad.

Background

  • In February 2003, Iran revealed its uranium enrichment program at Natanz, claiming it was using the technology for peaceful purposes and inviting the UN nuclear monitoring body, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), to visit. The US, however, alleged that the program is part of a drive to develop nuclear weapons and sought to refer the Iranian case to the Security Council.
  • In November 2004, Tehran signed a temporary agreement with Germany, France and Britain to cease uranium enrichment and the IAEA issued Iran a clean bill of health, effectively avoiding Security Council intervention. Nevertheless, the IAEA said it could not confirm that Iran is not pursuing undeclared nuclear activities and referred the case to the UN Security Council.
  • In May 2006, the Security Council adopted a resolution endorsing the P5 and Germany offer of diplomatic and economic incentives and demanding that Iran suspend all uranium enrichment programs by August 31.
  • In December 2006, after Tehran's failure to comply, the Council imposed sanctions on Iran's trade in sensitive nuclear materials and technology. Following the IAEAS offer to Tehran of a 60 day grace period where halting of the country's uranium enrichment would be exchanged for suspension of UN sanctions which Iran did not take up, the Security Council passed Resolution 1747 in March 2007, intensifying the previous sanctions package. Iran has vowed to continue with its nuclear energy program, but informal talks continue.
  • President Bush has taken a hard line against Iran, naming it in 2002 as part of the 'Axis of Evil' and leaving discussion of Iran's nuclear ambitions up to the international community. However, with the neighboring Iraq on the verge of full-out civil war, both Iran and the U.S. must realize that, economic sanctions aside, they have a mutual stakes in the world requiring a progressive dialogue.

Debate

Recent Developments


Where do the major players stand on this Issue?

Stance Person Profession
Joe Biden (D) Senator & 2008 Vice Presidential Candidate
Hillary Clinton (D) Senator & Former First Lady
Chris Dodd (D) Senator & 2008 Democratic Superdelegate
John Edwards (D) Attorney and Former Presidential Candidate
Rudy Giuliani (R) Fmr. NYC Mayor
Mike Gravel Fmr. Alaskan Senator
Duncan Hunter (R) Congressman
Dennis Kucinich (D) Congressman
Barack Obama (D) Senator and Presidential Candidate
Ron Paul (R) Congressman and Physician
Bill Richardson (D) Governor
Mitt Romney (R) CEO & Former Governor
Tom Tancredo (R) U.S. Representative
Tommy Thompson (R) Former Wisconsin governor and Secretary of Health and Human Serivces
Fred Thompson (R) Presidential Candidate, Lawyer, Lobbyist, Actor, and Former Senator
George W. Bush (R) President of the United States
Lew Rockwell

Show topics from

Economic Sanctions on Iran Forum


Topic (jump to last post >>) Last Post Forum Posts
Iran must be civilized or ostracized >>
started by Niels, views since Oct 12, 2007
ShadowRyu (D) >>
Updated 2 hours, 6 minutes ago
Economic Sanctions on Iran
21