niceday21

LOL. You obviously did not get the message from your own party.

This election is about change, not experience (allegedly).

Would you Democrats nominate Obama again in 2012, if/when McCain wins the election in November.

Just interested to know if you would then give Hillary her go in 2012 or whether you would still stick with Obama. Or would you go for a third person altogether??

still stuck in his death spiral of inane insults, lies and evasions. I don't even need to beat him when he defeats himself so regularly."

HelloDollyLlama says:

still stuck in his death spiral of inane insults, lies and evasions. I don't even need to beat him when he defeats himself so regularly."

Yawn. Even your put downs are looking old and desperate.

The Obama campaign is NOT running with this. Leading Democrats are NOT running with this. Most Democratic supporters, including on this forum, are NOT running with this.

The only one is you HDL. The Lonely Warrior.

Most of your threads regurgitate the same nonesense - hence people turning off.

I responded to your INITAL comments, as have numerous other Republicans including dpkell etc.

Unfortunately, you ignore them and continue your lonely crusade. Oh well, you will always have Shadow to cheer you on.

What cause!!

So suddenly Hillary is the only woman entitled to be on the ticket. And she cant, nobody else can.

It was this logic which wrecked Sebellius chances.

Sorry, the GOP arent playing this game. Palin has paid her dues and she is here on merit.

Get used to it.

So far, HDL has posted approaching 50 threads attacking Palin. Nobody, and no issue, has attracted so much attention in the history of this forum.

I have enough experience of HDL to know that when he goes on the sort of frenzied attack we are seeing right now, it is because he is scared.

HDL - you wanted Romney or Ridge or Lieberman and instead you got a game changer. A powerful woman who delivered a knockout convention speech to 32 million Americans. And you are terrified.

You can see that the attacks are backfiring and your attempts to tar her with rumours and dirt from her past in Wasilla just will not stick. It is too small time. Americans dont give a shit.

You are frustrated because PAlin is being carefully managed by the McCain team. You want her to slip up, make a gaffe. But she wont. She will continue raising millions of dollars.

You want to turn to people against her, but you are just turning people away from your own threads. The number of people reading and replying has bottomed out. People arent interested. The case has been made. Nobody bought it - but you keep on going.

Pretty sad really, you are fighting a losing battle. Not even the Obama campaign is with you on this one. Get on message, for your own sake.

Im laughing my ass off that you are still trying to run with the Palin thing. MAking an issue out of anything you can get your hands on.

Let me educate you: Palin got over 32 million viewers for her Convention speech, and they all saw her hit a home-run. Palin electrifed the audience and has galvanised the Republican base (uh oh, guess you will have to drop the "evangelicals and conservatives wont back McCain" narrative).

Your attacks are actually having the OPPOSITE effect to what is intended. People are sympathising with Palin - the majority recognise that these attacks having nothing to do with her "judgement" - it is all about crucifying the McCain running mate.

PS. Keep going. All this will come back to bite Obama in the ass if he wins the Presidency.

What a hypocrite. You were trashing Hillary about a month ago, saying she was the "past" and "irrelevant". Now, you wheel her out because you realise you need a strong woman to do battle with Palin.

How are you any better than the neo-cons??

Sounds like a load of crap to me.

No facts, no links.

Sorry, in your own words, you lose!

"The McCain campaign must be giddy with this news, just out from Nielsen: Sarah Palin's speech generated 37.2 million viewers, just a 1.1 million viewers fewer than watch Barack Obama's Invesco Field acceptance speech. As Nielsen notes, only six networks carried Palin's speech compared with ten for Obama's."

The Far-Left is now trying to slur Palin for exploiting her family. Apparently, RECOGNIZING that you have a down syndrome child is the equivalent of using him for political purposes. What a terrible mother Palin is, craddling her baby and showing the world she is proud of deciding to keep him. What a terrible mother she is, speaking about her pride in her eldest son who is serving in Iraq. What a terrible mother she is, proudly telling the truth about her daughter Bristol and her pregnancy, rather than allowing her family to be destroyed by rumours spread by the Liberal hate machine.

By the way, how many times has Palin appeared on "Access Hollywood" - that serious, hard-hitting political affairs programme? ZERO. No, it was The Precious who paraded he wife and two very young daughters on that programme to show voters just what a great "apple pie", loving, "typical" American family he had.

Palin protects her family, she does not allow her young daughters to be prodded and poked by celebrity interviewers.

Ecen Obama admitted afterwards he was ashamed by how he had acted...letting the celebrity, gossip media to intrude into his daughters private lives.

Grow up you hypocrites and take a look at how your own candidate behaves before attacking Palin.

You brought up her looks in the first place. You were uunhappy that the picture of Clinton didnt show her as a radiant beauty. DUH! She is 60 years old.

You brought up her looks in the first place. You were uunhappy that the picture of Clinton didnt show her as a radiant beauty. DUH! She is 60 years old.

So you intend to ignore his record and repeat your lies.

OK. Just so I know not to bother trying to debate you anymore.

So you intend to ignore his record and repeat your lies.

OK. Just so I know not to bother trying to debate you anymore.

Not relevant. Stay on topic.

Not relevant. Stay on topic.

I said "one of". Pay attention.

I said "one of". Pay attention.

Hold on a minute you prat.

Two of his achievements you dismiss as "non-controversial". So suddenly only "controversial" achievements carry weight now??

And what about shaking up campaign finance reform and taking on Big Tobacco - he went against his party and the lobbysists. Id say that was pretty controversial.

You ask, "what has McCain led?". Errrrrr...how about a force of A-7 attack aircraft, the Senate Commerce Committee, the Indian Affairs Committee.  the Senate Armed Services Committee...

You have been running around saying McCain has achieved NOTHING in 30 years - well this list proves otherwise and your attempts at distracting from his achievements just comes across as petty and stupid.

Hold on a minute you prat.

Two of his achievements you dismiss as "non-controversial". So suddenly only "controversial" achievements carry weight now??

And what about shaking up campaign finance reform and taking on Big Tobacco - he went against his party and the lobbysists. Id say that was pretty controversial.

You ask, "what has McCain led?". Errrrrr...how about a force of A-7 attack aircraft, the Senate Commerce Committee, the Indian Affairs Committee.  the Senate Armed Services Committee...

You have been running around saying McCain has achieved NOTHING in 30 years - well this list proves otherwise and your attempts at distracting from his achievements just comes across as petty and stupid.

Anyway, Barack will have plenty of time to accumulate experience when he gets landed back in the Senate.

Anyway, Barack will have plenty of time to accumulate experience when he gets landed back in the Senate.

What if McCain was twenty years younger??

What if McCain was twenty years younger??

You were sat in a high chair being fed liquidised carrot when Reagan was in office. What the hell do you know anyway.

You were sat in a high chair being fed liquidised carrot when Reagan was in office. What the hell do you know anyway.